Busqueda en Google

Motor de busqueda especializado en la Ciudad de Vigo


lunes, 29 de mayo de 2023

Why Receipt Notifications Increase Security In Signal

This blog post is aimed to express and explain my surprise about Signal being more secure than I thought (due to receipt acknowledgments). I hope you find it interesting, too.

Signal, and especially its state update protocol, the Double Ratchet algorithm, are widely known for significantly increasing security for instant messaging. While most users first see the end-to-end security induced by employing Signal in messaging apps, the properties achieved due to ratcheting go far beyond protecting communication against (active) attackers on the wire. Due to updating the local device secrets via the Double Ratchet algorithm, the protocol ensures that attackers, who temporarily obtain a device's local storage (on which Signal runs), only compromise confidentiality of parts of the communications with this device. Thus, the leakage of local secrets from a device only affects security of a short frame of communication. The exact duration of compromise depends on the messaging pattern among the communicating parties (i.e., who sends and receives when), as the state update is conducted during the sending and receiving of payload messages.


The Double Ratchet

The Double Ratchet algorithm consists of two different update mechanisms: the symmetric ratchet and the asymmetric ratchet. The former updates symmetric key material by hashing and then overwriting it with the hash output (i.e.,  k:=H(k)). Thus, an attacker, obtaining key material can only predict future versions of the state but, due to the one-wayness of the hash function, cannot recover past states. The asymmetric ratchet consists of Diffie-Hellman key exchanges (DHKE). If, during the communication, party A receives a new DH share gb as part of a message from the communication partner B, then A samples a new DH exponent a and responds with the respective DH share ga in the next sent message. On receipt of this DH share, B will again sample a new DH exponent b' and attach the DH share gb' to the next message to A. With every new DH share, a new DHKE gab is computed among A and B and mixed into the key material (i.e., k:=H(k,gab)). For clarity, I leave out a lot of details and accuracy. As new DH shares ga and gb are generated from randomly sampled DH exponents a and b, and the computation of gab is hard if neither a nor b are known, the key material recovers from an exposure of the local secrets to an attacker after a new value gab was freshly established and mixed into it. Summing up this mechanism, if an attacker obtains the local state of a Signal client, then this attacker cannot recover any previously received message (if the message itself was not contained in the local state), nor can it read messages that are sent after a new gab was established and mixed into the state. The latter case happens with every full round-trip among A and B (i.e., A receives from B, A sends to B, and A receives again from B).
Conceptual depiction of Double Ratchet in Signal two years ago (acknowledgments were only protected between client and server). The asymmetric ratchet fully updates the local secrets after one round-trip of payload messages.

Research on Ratcheting

During the last two years, the Signal protocol inspired the academic research community: First, a formal security proof of Signal was conducted [1] and then ratcheting was formalized as a generic primitive (independent of Signal) [2,3,4]. This formalization includes security definitions that are derived via 1. defining an attacker, 2. requiring security unless it is obvious that security cannot be reached. Protocols, meeting this optimal notion of security, were less performant than the Double Ratchet algorithm [3,4]. However, it became evident that the Double Ratchet algorithm is not as secure as it could be (e.g., recovery from exposure could be achieved quicker than after a full round-trip; see, e.g., Appendix G of our paper [3]). Afterwards, protocols (for slightly weakened security notions) were proposed that are similarly performant as Signal but also a bit more secure [5,6,7].

Protecting Acknowledgments ...

In our analysis of instant messaging group chats [8] two years ago (blog posts: [9,10]), we found out that none of the group chat protocols (Signal, WhatsApp, Threema) actually achieves real recovery from an exposure (thus the asymmetric ratchet is not really effective in groups; a good motivation for the MLS project) and that receipt acknowledgments were not integrity protected in Signal nor WhatsApp. The latter issue allowed an attacker to drop payload messages in transmission and forge receipt acknowledgments to the sender such that the sender falsely thinks the message was received. Signal quickly reacted on our report by treating acknowledgments as normal payload messages: they are now authenticated(-encrypted) using the Double Ratchet algorithm.

... Supports Asymmetric Ratchet

Two years after our analysis, I recently looked into the Signal code again. For a training on ratcheting I wanted to create an exercise for which the lines in the code should be found that execute the symmetric and the asymmetric ratchet respectively. Somehow I observed that the pure symmetric ratchet (only updates via hash functions) was nearly never executed (especially not when I expected it) when lively debugging the app but almost always new DH shares were sent or received. I realized that, due to encrypting the receipt acknowledgments now, the app always conducts full round-trips with every payload message. In order to observe the symmetric ratchet, I needed to temporarily turn on the flight mode on my phone such that acknowledgments are not immediately returned.
Conceptual depiction of Double Ratchet in Signal now (acknowledgments encrypted). The asymmetric ratchet fully updates the local secrets after an acknowledgment for a message is received.

Consequently, Signal conducts a full DHKE on every sent payload message (in case the receiving device is not offline) and mixes the result into the state. However, a new DH exponent is always already sampled on the previous receipt (see sketch of protocol above). Thus, the exponent for computing a DHKE maybe remained in the local device state for a while. In order to fully update the state's key material, two round-trips must be initiated by sending two payload messages and receiving the resulting two acknowledgments. Please note that not only the mandatory receipt acknowledgments are encrypted but also notifications on typing and reading a message.

If you didn't understand exactly what that means, here a tl;dr: If an attacker obtains your local device state, then with Signal all previous messages stay secure and (if the attacker does not immediately use these secrets to actively manipulate future conversations) all future messages are secure after you wrote two messages (and received receipt acknowledgments) in all of your conversations. Even though this is very (in practice certainly sufficiently) secure, recent protocols provide stronger security (as mentioned above) and it remains an interesting research goal to increase their performance.

[1] https://eprint.iacr.org/2016/1013.pdf
[2] https://eprint.iacr.org/2016/1028.pdf
[3] https://eprint.iacr.org/2018/296.pdf
[4] https://eprint.iacr.org/2018/553.pdf
[5] https://eprint.iacr.org/2018/889.pdf
[6] https://eprint.iacr.org/2018/954.pdf
[7] https://eprint.iacr.org/2018/1037.pdf
[8] https://eprint.iacr.org/2017/713.pdf
[9] https://web-in-security.blogspot.com/2017/07/insecurities-of-whatsapps-signals-and.html
[10] https://web-in-security.blogspot.com/2018/01/group-instant-messaging-why-baming.html

Read more


  1. World No 1 Hacker Software
  2. Pentest Automation Tools
  3. Hacker Tools Windows
  4. Hacker Tools Mac
  5. Hacking Tools Online
  6. Hacker Tools Hardware
  7. Hacking Tools And Software
  8. Hacker Tools Github
  9. Hacker Tools
  10. New Hack Tools
  11. Hacker Tools Apk Download
  12. Hack Tools For Games
  13. Hack Tools Online
  14. Pentest Automation Tools
  15. Hacking Tools For Windows 7
  16. Hack And Tools
  17. Pentest Tools Open Source
  18. Hacker Tools Windows
  19. Hack Tools For Mac
  20. Hacking Tools For Windows 7
  21. Beginner Hacker Tools
  22. Nsa Hack Tools
  23. Hack Tools Pc
  24. Game Hacking
  25. Pentest Tools Windows
  26. Pentest Tools Subdomain
  27. Ethical Hacker Tools
  28. Pentest Tools List
  29. Hack Tools
  30. Pentest Tools Url Fuzzer
  31. Hacking Tools Free Download
  32. Ethical Hacker Tools
  33. Hacking Tools For Kali Linux
  34. Pentest Tools Linux
  35. Hack App
  36. Hack Tools
  37. Pentest Tools Apk
  38. Pentest Tools Open Source
  39. Hack Tools Mac
  40. Hack Tool Apk
  41. Hack Tools For Windows
  42. Hacking Tools 2020
  43. Hack Tools Mac
  44. World No 1 Hacker Software
  45. Android Hack Tools Github
  46. Hacking Tools Online
  47. What Is Hacking Tools
  48. Hacker Tools List
  49. Best Hacking Tools 2020
  50. Pentest Tools Online
  51. Hacking Tools For Beginners
  52. Hack Tools Download
  53. Hack Tools 2019
  54. Hack Tools
  55. Hacker Tools Free Download
  56. What Is Hacking Tools
  57. Hacking Tools
  58. Free Pentest Tools For Windows
  59. Hacking Tools Windows
  60. Nsa Hack Tools Download
  61. Hacking Tools For Windows
  62. Hackers Toolbox
  63. Pentest Tools
  64. Hack Tools
  65. Hacking Tools Software
  66. Hack Tools Pc
  67. Hacking Tools Hardware
  68. Hacking Tools Name
  69. Free Pentest Tools For Windows
  70. Hacking Apps
  71. Pentest Tools Find Subdomains
  72. Hacking Tools For Pc
  73. Hacking Tools For Beginners
  74. Game Hacking
  75. Pentest Tools Github
  76. Hacker Tools
  77. Best Hacking Tools 2019
  78. Pentest Tools Subdomain
  79. Hacking Tools
  80. Hacker Tools For Ios
  81. Pentest Tools Review
  82. Hacker Tools Linux
  83. Pentest Tools For Ubuntu
  84. Hacker Tools Software
  85. Hacker Search Tools
  86. Hacking Tools Hardware
  87. Pentest Tools For Ubuntu
  88. Hack Rom Tools
  89. Hacking Tools Hardware
  90. Hack Tools For Ubuntu
  91. Hacking Tools For Games
  92. Pentest Tools Framework
  93. Pentest Tools Open Source
  94. Termux Hacking Tools 2019
  95. Pentest Tools Framework
  96. Hacking Tools Download
  97. Tools For Hacker
  98. Pentest Tools Nmap
  99. Hacker Tools List
  100. Pentest Tools Download
  101. Install Pentest Tools Ubuntu
  102. Hacker Tools Apk Download
  103. Ethical Hacker Tools
  104. Hacking Tools For Windows
  105. Hacking Tools Kit
  106. Pentest Tools Download
  107. What Is Hacking Tools
  108. Hacking App
  109. What Are Hacking Tools
  110. Pentest Tools Tcp Port Scanner
  111. Hacker
  112. Pentest Tools Alternative
  113. Pentest Tools Android
  114. Hacking Apps
  115. Pentest Tools Bluekeep
  116. Hacking Tools Github
  117. Tools Used For Hacking
  118. Nsa Hack Tools Download
  119. Pentest Tools For Mac
  120. Wifi Hacker Tools For Windows
  121. Hacking Tools Hardware
  122. Hacking Tools Kit
  123. New Hack Tools
  124. Hack Tool Apk No Root
  125. Hacking Tools Mac
  126. Nsa Hacker Tools

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario

Google Map de Vigo

Busqueda en Todovigo

Motor de busqueda especializado en la Ciudad de Vigo